Comparison of Regional and General Anesthesia in Eclampsia Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section: A Literature Review

Hijriah Syafitri; Mona Nulanda; Julia Hasir

doi:10.71435/742296

Authors

Hijriah Syafitri Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Mona Nulanda Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Julia Hasir Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71435/742296

Keywords:

Eclampsia, Cesarean section, Regional anesthesia, Spinal anesthesia, General anesthesia, Maternal and neonatal outcomes

Abstract

Eclampsia is a life-threatening obstetric emergency requiring prompt delivery and careful anesthetic management during cesarean section. This literature review aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of regional anesthesia, particularly spinal anesthesia, with general anesthesia in patients with preeclampsia or eclampsia undergoing cesarean section. A narrative literature review was conducted using articles retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and other relevant scientific sources. Articles published between 2018 and 2025 that examined maternal hemodynamic parameters and maternal or neonatal outcomes were included. Sixteen original studies with prospective, retrospective, observational, comparative, cohort, cross-sectional, and randomized designs were reviewed. Overall, spinal anesthesia was associated with more controlled intraoperative hemodynamics, fewer postoperative maternal complications, reduced intensive care requirements, shorter hospitalization, and better neonatal outcomes than general anesthesia. Although hypotension occurred in approximately 47–50% of patients receiving spinal anesthesia, it was generally transient and manageable with vasopressors. In contrast, general anesthesia was more frequently associated with hypertensive responses during laryngoscopy and intubation, pulmonary edema, renal complications, postoperative seizures, and delayed recovery. Neonates delivered under spinal anesthesia generally had higher first- and fifth-minute APGAR scores, lower rates of neonatal asphyxia, and reduced neonatal intensive care requirements. In conclusion, spinal anesthesia demonstrates a more favorable maternal and neonatal safety profile and should be considered the preferred technique when no contraindications are present. General anesthesia remains necessary in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, impaired consciousness, coagulation disorders, airway concerns, or clinical conditions requiring immediate airway control and rapid delivery.

References

Ahmadzadeh, S., Duplechin, D. P., Bailey, P. D., Duplechan, D. T., Enache, A. J., Moore, P., & Shekoohi, S. (2025). Anesthetic management for delivery in parturients with heart disease: a narrative review. Biomedicines, 13(7), 1736.

Akbar, R. J. A., & Yas, A. K. (2022). Effect of spinal anaesthesia in pregnant women with preeclampsia. World Bulletin of Public Health, 12, 19–24.

Al Dallal, H. B., & Al-Jobury, B. T. (2024). Anesthesia type outcome in severe pre-eclampsia with caesarean section. Al-Qadisiyah Medical Journal, 7(1), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v7i1.1067

Aregawi, A., Terefe, T., Admasu, W., & Akalu, L. (2018). Comparing the effect of spinal and general anaesthesia for pre-eclamptic mothers who underwent caesarean delivery in a tertiary, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 28(4), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v28i4.10

Aregawi, A., Terefe, T., Admasu, W., & Akalu, L. (2018). Comparing the effect of spinal and general anaesthesia for pre-eclamptic mothers who underwent caesarean delivery in a tertiary, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 28(4), 443–450.

Basith, A., & Adnan, M. L. (2026). Anesthesia management in patient with eclampsia and HELLP syndrome: A case report. Jurnal Ilmiah Kedokteran Wijaya Kusuma, 15(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.30742/jikw.v15i1.4955

Belachew, B. G., Kasahun, B., Demissie, B. W., Sintayhu, A., Dendir, G., Ali, A., et al. (2023). Comparison of the hemodynamic changes between preeclamptic and normotensive parturients who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia at North Showa Zone public hospitals, Oromia Region, Ethiopia, 2022: A prospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiology, 23(1), 1–12.

Chadha, H., Aggarwal, R., & Prasad, R. (2023). To evaluate the maternal and foetal outcome in parturients undergoing caesarean section for pre-eclampsia under spinal and general anaesthesia: A randomised prospective study. Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, 9(4), 304–309.

Dawood, M., Rasool, N., & Farooq, N. (2020). Maternal and fetal outcome of spinal versus general anaesthesia in pre-eclampsia cases undergoing caesarean section. 24(2), 1669–1675.

Elawad, O. A. M., Elamin, O. H., Yousif, A. I. A., & Ejaimi, G. A. M. (2024). Comparing general versus spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in severely pre-eclamptic parturients. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences, 19(4), 473–481.

Fadhilah, N., & Widyastuti, R. (2022). Eklampsia. Continuing Medical Education.

Fendiputra, M., Lalenoh, D. C., & Posangi, I. (2025). Profil hemodinamik dan skala nyeri pada pasien preeklampsia dan eklampsia yang dilakukan seksio sesarea serta luaran neonatal (skor APGAR). Journal of Comprehensive Science, 4(12), 3340–3355.

Fu, G., Xu, L., Chen, H., & Lin, J. (2025). State-of-the-art anesthesia practices: a comprehensive review on optimizing patient safety and recovery. BMC surgery, 25(1), 32.

Garg, B., Ahuja, K., & Sharan, A. D. (2022). Regional anesthesia for spine surgery. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 30(17), 809-819.

Grace, E. (2026). Maternal Outcomes Following Different Anesthetic Techniques for Emergency Cesarean Delivery.

Kamel, I., Ahmed, M. F., & Sethi, A. (2022). Regional anesthesia for orthopedic procedures: What orthopedic surgeons need to know. World journal of orthopedics, 13(1), 11.

Katsi, V., Svigkou, A., & Dima, I. (2024). Diagnosis and treatment of eclampsia. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 11.

Kaushal, A., & Haldar, R. (2020). Regional anesthesia in neuroanesthesia practice. Discoveries, 8(2), e111.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Pedoman nasional pelayanan kedokteran: Tatalaksana gangguan hipertensi pada kehamilan.

Kesumah, A., & Rustini, R. (2020). Perbandingan nilai APGAR bayi yang lahir melalui sectio caesarea dengan anestesia umum dan anestesia spinal. Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas, 9(1), 107–112.

Kovacheva, V. P., Venkatachalam, S., Pfister, C., & Anwer, T. (2024). Preeclampsia and eclampsia: Enhanced detection and treatment for morbidity reduction. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 38(3), 246-256.

Leofirsta, H., & Soepraptomo, R. T. H. (2022). Manajemen anestesi pada ibu hamil dengan preeklampsia berat, sistemik lupus eritematosus dan sindroma antifosfolipid [Anesthesia management in woman with severe preeclampsia, systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome]. Jurnal Anestesi Obstetri Indonesia, 5, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.47507/obstetri.v5i3.103

Lim, G., Facco, F. L., Nathan, N., Waters, J. H., Wong, C. A., & Eltzschig, H. K. (2018). A review of the impact of obstetric anesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Anesthesiology, 129(1), 192.

Loh, C. J. L., Qi, Y., Sultana, R., Tan, C. W., Sng, B. L., & Yahaya, Z. (2024). Hemodynamic changes of women with preeclampsia undergoing spinal anesthesia for emergency cesarean section: A prospective observational study. Bali Journal of Anesthesiology, 8(3), 164–168.

Min, W. K., Jin, S., Lee, Y., Cho, J., Kim, S., & Choi, E. (2026). Association of pre-eclampsia with intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative complications in cesarean delivery under general anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15, 1–14.

Neme, D., Aweke, Z., Jemal, B., Mulgeta, H., Regasa, T., Garolla, G., et al. (2022). Effect of anesthesia choice on hemodynamic stability and fetomaternal outcome of the preeclamptic patient undergoing cesarean section. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 77, 103654.

Overton, E., Tobes, D., & Lee, A. (2022). Preeclampsia diagnosis and management. Best practice & research Clinical anaesthesiology, 36(1), 107-121.

Rupwate, K., Patil, S., & Kesh, R. (2023). The type of anesthesia and outcome in preeclamptic patients undergoing cesarean section: An observational study. Medical Journal of Dr. DY Patil Vidyapeeth, 16(2), 178–185.

Satpute, S. A. (2020). Comparative study of general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia in severe pre-eclampsia patients undergoing emergency caesarean section in tertiary care centre. MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 15(3), 87–92.

Singariya, G., Yuvaraj, S., Kamal, M., Garg, M., Chhabra, A., & Khatri, C. (2024). Comparison of hemodynamic changes in normotensive and preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Indian Anaesthesia Forum, 25(1), 58–59.

Sinha, D. K., Verma, S. K., & Kumar, H. (2025). Comparative study of general anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia in pre-eclampsia patients undergoing emergency caesarean section. International Journal of Scientific Research, 16(11), 494–502.

Supraptomo, R. (2024). Seksio sesarea emergensi dengan regional anestesi pasien G1P0A0, preeklamsi berat (PEB), ketuban pecah dini (KPD), ascites permagna, hipoalbumin, suspek sindroma nefrotik [Emergency caesarean section with regional anesthesia in a patient with severe preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes, massive ascites, hypoalbuminemia, and suspected nephrotic syndrome]. Jurnal Anestesi Obstetri Indonesia, 8(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.47507/obstetri.v8i2.202

Thakar, U. H., Panjabi, G. M., & Gami, D. D. (2024). Comparison of spinal versus general anesthesia for cesarean delivery in patients with severe preeclampsia. Journal of Medical Sciences, 7(6), 1044–1048.

van Dyk, D., Dyer, R. A., & Fernandes, N. L. (2021). Preeclampsia in 2021—a perioperative medical challenge for the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology Clinics, 39(4), 711-725.

Zagrodnik, E., Szczuko, M., & Surówka, A. (2026). Hemodynamic changes during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia in normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women—A narrative review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062162