Organizational Culture in the OAP Welfare Program in Biak Numfor District

Rudiyansyah Rudiyansyah

Authors

Rudiyansyah Public Administration Study Program, Hasanuddin University

Keywords:

Organizational Culture, Innovation, Program Risk, Innovative Behavior, OAP Welfare

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the organizational culture in the implementation of the Indigenous Papuan (OAP) welfare program in Biak Numfor Regency, with an emphasis on support for innovation, tolerance for risk and failure, and appreciation for innovative behavior. This study uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation, then analyzed interpretively to understand the values, bureaucratic practices, institutional relations, and implementation patterns of the Indigenous Papuan welfare program at the regional level. The results of the study indicate that the organizational culture in the Indigenous Papuan welfare program has a hierarchical-communal character with developing adaptive capacity. Support for innovation is evident through a variety of programs, such as decent housing, basic food assistance, direct cash assistance (BLT), boat engines, and business assistance. Tolerance for risk and failure is evident through the recipient selection mechanism, self-management system, and technical supervision, although it is still more oriented towards administrative control than institutional learning. Appreciation for innovative behavior is evident through community involvement, the role of village governments, and the social legitimacy of beneficiaries, but has not been fully institutionalized in the formal organizational system. The organizational culture within the Indigenous Peoples' (OPP) welfare program in Biak Numfor Regency has provided a foundation for responsive, accountable, and community-accepted program implementation. However, this culture still needs to be strengthened through institutionalization of innovation, risk-based learning, inter-program integration, and recognition of innovative practices to foster broader, deeper, and more sustainable transformation of Indigenous Peoples' (OPP) welfare.

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.

Bogale, A. T., & Debela, K. L. (2024). Organizational culture: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2340129. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2340129

Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930110400128

Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Creswell, John W (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset: Memilih Di Antara Lima Pendekatan, terjemahan, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Creswell, John W (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran, terjemahan, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Damele, G., & Campos, A. S. (2022). Introduction. Elite theory Philosophical challenges. Topoi, 41(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09794-1

De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.204

Dye, T. R. (1967). Governmental Structure, Urban Environment, and Educational Policy. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 11(3), 353. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108617

Esping, Gosta and Andersen. (1999). Why We Need a New Welfare State. New York: Oxford.

Fatem, S. M., Maryudi, A., Pudyatmoko, S., & Marwa, J. (2020). Model Kelembagaan Lokal Kabupaten Konservasi Tambrauw di Papua Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, 14(2), 167-184.

Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x

Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.007

Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2014). Conceptualizing public policy. In I. Engeli & C. R. Allison (Eds.), Comparative policy studies: Conceptual and methodological challenges (pp. 17–33). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314154_2

Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. NESTA/The Young Foundation.

Nuraini, C., Darwanto, D. H., Masyhuri, M., & Jamhari, J. (2016). Model Kelembagaan pada Agribisnis Padi Organik Kabupaten Tasikmalaya. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 2(1), 9-16.

Paine, F. T., & Naumes, W. (1975). Organizational strategy & policy. Saunders.

Parsons, Wayne. 2006. Publik Policy: Pengantar Teori dan Praktik Analisis Kebijakan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Phills, J. A., Jr., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.

Policy Toward Organizational Learning and Policy Change. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 2(1), 1- 10.

Quade. 1984., analisis for public decision, Elsevier science publishere. New york Rosner,ْ R.L.ْ 2003.ْ “Earningsْ Manipulationْ inْ Failingْ Firms”ْ Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (2 )(Summer 2003) pp. 361–408.

Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Sjoraida, D. F. (2017). Urgensi unsur elit dalam pelaksanaan kebijakan informasi publik di jawa barat. JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik), 2(2), 1-10.

Smith, M. R. 1973. House Investing Ants of the Eastern United States: Their Recognation, Biology and Economic Important.Technical Bulletin No. 1326.

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768

Stake, Robert E, “Studi Kasus”, Dalam Norman K. Denzin dan Yvonna S. Lincoln eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, terjemahan, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Suryono, A. (2014). Kebijakan publik untuk kesejahteraan rakyat. Transparansi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 6(2), 98-102.

Toha, M., & Hilmy, M. (2020). Pendidikan Islam di Kota Metropolis: Studi Kebijakan Penyelenggaraan PAI di Surabaya. Inteligensia Media.

Triastuti, M. R. H. (2003). Analisis Formulasi Kebijakan Kenaikan Tarif Listrik, Telepon dan BBM di Tahun 2003: Disintegrate System Model of Public

Walukow, A. F. (2012). Analisis Kebijakan Penurunan Luas Hutan Di Daerah Aliran Sungai Sentani Berwawasan Lingkungan (Environmental Based of Policy Analysis About the Decrease of Forest Area in Sentani Watershed). Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan, 19(1), 74-84.

Wibowo, L. R. (2013). Analisis Kebijakan Publik Pengembangan Model Kelembagaan Kompensasi Das Ciliwung (Public policy analysis on the development of a compensation institution model at Ciliwung Watershed). Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan, 20(3), 353-366

Yin, Robert K. (2003). Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode. Terjemahan, Jakarta: Rajawali Press

Zannoni, P. (1978). The concept of elite. European Journal of Political Research, 6(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1978.tb00547.x